Endo v Implants: An evidence-based debate (15-10-15-01)

AvailabilityCourse has taken place
Documents
ProgrammeSpeaker Information

Need help viewing PDF documents?

SubjectEndodontics
DescriptionAs implants are more readily available, the decision to provide or refer for an implant or offer endodontic treatment is part of daily clinical treatment planning. This course aims to challenge our perceptions of the best treatment to offer our patients using evidence based lively debate. There will be discussions on outcomes of the different treatments, techniques and case discussions. Please see the programme for more details.
Additional information

Our speakers Paul Wilson and Jonathan Cowie are ideally positioned to discuss this subject. Paul WilsonBSc(Hons) BDS(Hons) MSc(Lond) FDSRCPS FDS(RestDent) DipDSed(Lond) is a Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Specialist in Restorative Dentistry and  Senior Clinical Lecturer. Jonathan Cowie, BDS, Dip Endo, MClinDent (Endo), M Endo RCS (Ed) is a Specialist in Endodontics and Specialty Dentist in Restorative Dentistry, Bristol Dental Hospital.  Please see attached information for more details.

Muddifords Court is 8 minutes off Junction 27 M5 at the end of the North Devon link road, easily reached from Exeter and further south and north. Tiverton parkway station is about 15 minutes away. Pleased see the attached document for more information.

VenueMuddifords Court Country House, Cullompton - Devon N & E  View details
Date & timeThursday 15 October 2015, 09:00 to 16:00
LecturersMr Jonathan Cowie & Mr Paul H R Wilson  View details
Target audience

Recommended to all

Development outcomeNo development outcome
Course styleLecture
Catering Meal
Core topic Not a core topic
CPD hours6:00
Cost£36.00
Aims

This interactive debate will challenge participants to form a deeper understanding of which care is best: endodontic treatment or dental implants?

Objectives

At the end of the course, participants will have:

1. An evidence-based knowledge of endodontic and dental implant outcomes;

2. Be able to inform their daily clinical decision making through critical appraisal;

3. Challenge preconceived ideas about ‘gold-standard’ patient care over the long-term.